Let’s begin with a few
historical notes on the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill of Rights to
indicate that this critic below is likely a federal plant out to
trick the naive and gullible of the public who never researches
anything for themselves. He does not want you to be able to practice
your legal rights under American law. He wrote this as a comment to
my report posted last night Sept. 29, 2015 with Nesara News. My
report was:

SEPT. 29, 2015 Link to read it at is:

To: ERASMUS …..You Best stick to ALL the rest of the stuff you
are the worlds foremost authority on…. Number one a Common law
trust is revocable and can be breeched by the Infernal revenue
service….and does not offer the security of a Spindrift Irrevocable
trust….. You need to study this as our team could tear this BS to
The spendthrift irrevocable has been called the
Rockefeller trust or the Harvard trust and is the only trust that
cannot be breached and is good for 200 years…. Besides it is
20times easier to use…

My report was posted at 6:10 PM. His comment back
was posted one hour and 18 minutes later. He was waiting to pounce on
this report once released and posted. I mention that because two of
us went under very savage apparent federal hacking attack for maybe
one hour or more trying to block the release of this national report
to Nesara News. Some wild hack apparent C.I.A. style hacking tricks
were tried trying to block this report by any means possible such as
the report instantly became two reports of the same at once, parts of
the report disappeared, some copies of the report we sent to
ourselves to proofread disappeared and never arrived back at our
email address. Both of our computers were instantly attacked at the
same moment as we tried to make one good copy of this report, but our
apparent C.I.A. hackers assigned by Obama to block us at all costs
were coming up with many electronic tricks trying to make it
impossible to send this report out. We finally figured out a trick
way to get out one good copy of this report and it was posted shortly
afterwards by Dan at Nesara News. Various functions of both of our
computers were operating in the electronic twilight zone where it was
hard to get any functions of both computers to work right. After the
report got sent, the electronic hacking attacks stopped.

Separately when talking on a couple of business
calls yesterday, I experienced savage hacking attacks of extreme
scratching sounds while the business calls went on. When I called and
talked to several other sources, there was no interfering sounds to
try and block the calls. They meaning the federal Obama Boys were
trying to censor my calls on issues of national scandals, etc. I
outwitted the Obama Boys where they did not know my true strength
built up from some time back, but when I ordered a small foreign
currency shipment to me from California, I knew almost instantly
something was wrong when constant false tracking information was
posted on what was supposed to be the national postal website for
America. They invented many different promised deliveries both
forward and in reverse of time (already delivered!). When they heard
I mentioned on the phone that I would soon be contacting the local
postmaster in charge of deliveries to our area and the Postmaster
General in Wash., D.C. to investigate this matter, the missing
shipment long overdue suddenly showed up.

I had received this package from a company I had
ordered from before. Something caught my eye as not right with this
package. I pulled out another package I had received the same type
shipment from in an earlier month. The new label was a clever mimic
of the old, but two mistakes made to cover my package had been opened
by C.I.A. or whoever did this criminal act and when they realized a
criminal investigation was about to be pushed for, they had to invent
a shipping label to look like the old original used on it but they
had removed. They made two mistakes showing that this package had
been opened by them and then resealed it once they realized this was
too hot to try and block this shipment from me. And their
fingerprints may still be inside this package! I then deliberately
with another company placed one more small order and they did not
cover the shipping by a tracking number where the other company did.
This second package has never showed yet and is very overdue now.
This was a legal trap so I could later swear out an arrest warrant
for Obama at the White House and subordinates of his in this criminal
conspiracy. Some friends of mine knew that I had set up a legal trap
for Obama at the White House but Obama and gang were not smart enough
to smell how deadly this situation was in attempted robbery of the
U.S. mails. When the legal charges come, this is going to become a
big criminal case against Obama at the White House. He can be removed
from the White House over this criminal act ordered by him. He is the
only federal source with the authority to order federal personnel to
commit criminal acts like this, so we know who ordered this attempted
robbery of the U.S. mails. I can be a dangerous person to try
criminal tactics with as I am no fool at law and at investigations of
such criminal tactics if tried against me. Obama is in hot legal
water over this now!

Okay, back to the Common Law Trust report I
offered in my national report last night. It has many features to it
that are very useful to the average American who would like to set up
a family common law trust for their family and have the family run
it. Okay, points of law. The Preamble written by the U.S. Congress to
the U.S. Bill of Rights when ratified by the states stated in legal
language that the U.S. Bill of Rights is higher in legal authority
than the rest of the U.S. Constitution and the statute law authority
granted in the original U.S. Constitution can not be as high of law
in legal authority as the U.S. Bill of Rights whose legal authority
cannot be overthrown, overruled, or ignored by the U.S. Supreme
Court, U.S. Congress, White House, or federal agencies as the
ultimate law in authority if it is challenged in authority by
anything stated in the original U.S. Constitution before the U.S.
Bill of Rights was added to the U.S. Constitution by national
ratification. Amendment V of the U.S. Bill of Rights says that
federal law cannot be applied to the American citizens without due
process of law. Due process of law was defined by court ruling as the
common law of America which was to continue in America after the U.S.
Constitution was set up. If common law rights of Americans were
challenged by some form of federal law, the common law rights of the
American people prevail in legal authority. That is due process of
law by court ruling and basic definition. Amendment VII of the U.S.
Bill of Rights, the rules apply from common law to suits at common
law and not separate versions of federal law. Amendment IX of the
U.S. Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution shall not deny or
disparage others retained by the American people. These legal rights
were given names such as Natural Law Rights meaning God-given rights
no government could take away from the people, Common Law Rights
which were according to William Blackstone who was rated the leading
authority on English Common Law as retained by the Americans as the
practical application of Bible teachings to the formal law of England
as reflected and shown in English court rulings over the centuries.
This would include the major legal right of common law retained by
the American people of the God-given right to contract and the
God-given right to own property. Amendment X states that the powers
not delegated to the States by the Constitution nor prohibited remain
and are reserved the powers of the States, or to the people. Powers
here is a reference to the authority retained by the American people
such as to their common law rights which included according to
standard legal understanding then the legal right to contract
including creating common law trusts but basing their legal authority
upon Bible teachings upheld by English and American law before and
after the American Revolution.

It was upon this legal understanding of law which
no government could overturn whether federal government or state
government that the Continental Congress while fighting the American
Revolution against Great Britain called upon the citizens of America
of the Thirteen Colonies to raise the money and start industries for
America while the American Revolution was being fought. The
Continental Congress that General George Washington fought under
stated that no state governments had legal authority (nor federal
government understood here!) to deny the American people their
God-given right to contract and to property in America. Therefore,
state governments could not claim legal authority to license nor
regulate the God-given right to contract practiced in the 13 States.
So long as they practiced such as common law trusts by the legal
principles of common law, no government could prohibit them from
raising funds and setting up new industries for America while the
American Revolution was being fought. It was understood that only a
common law court could rule some act of the people done under claimed
common law right might be ruled wrong or could be civilly sued upon
or else criminally prosecuted upon in a common law court of America.
Under the legal terms America was founded upon during the American
Revolution and later ratified as permanent and could not be taken
away from the American people by either the federal government or
else an American state government formed out of a former colony of
Great Britain had no legal authority to outlaw nor alter the legal
authority and rights of the American people under understood retained
English common law that was retained as American law along with new
constitutional law which did not outlaw nor alter the basis of
retained English common law for America.

While the American Revolution was being fought,
President John Hancock of the Continental Congress and other members
of this Congress had experts write publications on how to set up new
industries in America and the Continental Congress promoted these
publications so Americans would know how to found new industries for
America. So long as these new industries did not harm the rights of
fellow Americans, they were quite legal to set up and establish for
future permanent industries of America. Under the Mercantile Policy
of Great Britain, the Thirteen Colonies were forbidden to set up
industries which could compete against English industries such as
textiles. Now by upholding common law rights in America, America
would grow from just being an agricultural nation to also an
industrial nation as well! Lecture on American history and common law
trusts over!

If the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Congress, White
House, State governments, etc. try to outlaw common law trusts such
as founded during the American Revolution, they commit formal high
treason against their oath of allegiance to uphold the U.S.
Constitution as the national law of America.

I looked up the terms as formalities in the search
engines for Google mentioned by the critic pretending to be such an
authority on common law trusts. One of the legal references brought
up by the Google search engine stated that “the spendthrift
trust” that he referred to was complex to handle and must have
an attorney to handle it. An irrevocable spendthrift trust has been
breached by the I.R.S. or state authorities according to some
references listed by the Google search engine. An irrevocable
spendthrift trust was governed by state law and at times creditors
could penetrate its security to try and place liens on the trust
assets. An irrevocable spendthrift trust was designed to make
beneficiaries unable to have any control in the trust and others
would basically have to be hired to run it for the listed beneficiary
or beneficiaries normally of the family as they could have no voice
in what happened with this type trust. The Rockefellers have lost
some of their family value in assets using this type fund over the
decades. The search engines did not come out in wild praise for what
is called a Rockefeller trust and was apparently expensive to set up
and run. The search engines recognized the term Harvard trust in only
limited way. There was formally a Harvard Property trust and after
that except for direct use by Harvard University they did not list
other versions of a Harvard trust for ordinary people to use.

After reading all the legal comments on the
spendthrift irrevocable trust as supplied by the Google search
engines, I like many features of the common law trust much better
than what I saw listed in the type trusts suggested by my critic. It
is cheap to set up. It can be turned into a spendthrift trust by
adding the sentence stating it is also a spendthrift trust for a
member of a family, etc., but that apparently submits you to all
sorts of regulations not required by an ordinary common law trust.
The ordinary common law trust can be made perpetual by voting renewal
of it every 25 years or so by the trustees. It is totally covered by
common law legal protections that this spendthrift irrevocable trust
is apparently being much more subject to statute law changes than a
common law trust which current law cannot change in basic operation
according to the U.S. Bill of Rights which legally forbid the federal
government or states governments from being able to forbid it from
being set up and maintain the type operation it has run by for
centuries before under standard common law.

As for the I.R.S., if they violate basic legal
rights of the American people with a common law trust for their
family, etc., the U.S. Taxpayers Legal Rights as part of I.R.S. law
entitles the American people to sue the I.R.S. and personnel and
officials of the I.R.S. for legal violations of their legal rights if
the I.R.S. tries it. Also, send them to prison if they get too much
out of line and engage in what is call criminal acts under law. Also,
once my proposed Omni Law is passed, we would hang I.R.S. officials
and personnel alive symbolically speaking who tried to violate any
legal rights covered by the U.S. Bill of Rights including the common
law legal rights of the American people protected by the U.S. Bill of
Rights as perpetual law.

After seeing what all was claimed for this
spendthrift irrevocable trust as required of it according to the
Google search engine reports on it, it sounds far more expensive to
have than an ordinary common law trust and contrary to the ordinary
common law trust which can be very inexpensive and easy for families
to run for their families, this spendthrift irrevocable trust sounds
like you have to keep one or more lawyers working for you maybe at
all times or you may get into trouble with the law. The family can
retain control of a common law trust. As for the spendthrift
irrevocable trust, maybe rich families have no problems hiring
professional trustees to run it for them, but for ordinary people,
this sounds like a bigger legal operation than they might want to
bite off in legal responsibility and cost of yearly operation.

From what I read from the reports listed by Google
search engines as to websites to read what they reported on
spendthrift trusts which they supported, this is the message I came
out with after reading them! As such as the Rockefellers are
shrinking in size of wealth using one of these spendthrift trusts run
by hired professionals for them, I will take instead one of these
inexpensive to set up common law trusts. In fact, shortly I plan to
set up a Christian trust for a Christian group called “the holy
cross-bearers of Jesus Christ” and will use the common law trust
of old, not the spendthrift irrevocable trust of new as my
recommended choice for them. I used to be a finance consultant and
set up big deals, etc. and have some idea what is smart in business
or not. Years ago I used to be the President of a financial
association and also chairman of an investment fund in America.
Again, my link for my report of Sept. 29, 2015 on common law trusts
that this critic disliked so strongly, it is


My website is www.fastboomamericaneconomy.com
My email is fastboomamericaneconomy.com@gmail.com
I have won a number of times on issues of constitutional law such as
once in federal court asking the federal judge if his court was
governed in legal authority by the U.S. Constitution as binding
national law on it or not. He got red in the face, but let
constitutional law be heard in his court after that. Some judges are
at war with constitutional law. When we pass the Omni Law, they get
fast yanked out of judicial office if they think they do not need to
obey the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill of Rights as binding
national law over their federal and state courts.

Full name of my proposed Omn Law is listed on my
website as “The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America.” Once
passed, the American people if challenged can call for national
referendums to either pass laws and policies or else cancel laws and
policies Wash., D.C. is trying to pass against the will of the
American people. The authority of the American people by national
referendum will decide what laws and policies they are to live under
in case Congress is trying hard to ignore the will of the American
people in legal issues.

Yours For God And Country, Erasmus Of America (Pen
name for that American leader who respects the legal principals
America was founded upon 1776! Their concept of God-given rights of
the American people was identical to the first political teachings of
first official Apostolic Christianity such as Bishop Irenaeus around
170 A.D. that the people are given God-given rights to decide what
form of government and laws they wanted to live under in their nation
or nations!)


P.S. As I know the training in psychological
warfare for some of the military and federal civilian personnel to
control the thinking and actions of the American people, I will
repeat this part of the report yesterday which is what the other side
wanted to erase from your minds if you had read it already.

I will briefly offer as a free bonus offer with
the Omni Law Loan Program my package of legal material which I
previously sold for $495.00. This shows you how to set up a common
law trust for yourself and how it is run by you once set up. It has
the sample common law trust which you substitute your name, etc. for
the sample name, etc. in order to set up your own common law trust
for yourself if you want to. This is the format that the attorney
supplied who wrote up this sample common law trust for you to use. It
has all sorts of court rulings on common law trusts covering
basically all the states of America listed in material the attorney
supplied as supporting legal documents for a Common Law Trust so you
can understand how this type law works for you.

Years ago when I once previously offered
this to the people, I had this collection of Common Law Trust
material offered for $175.00 plus state tax if they ordered it within
10 days. After that, this Common Law Trust package of material would
cost $495.00 for it. At this time through Oct. 10, 2015, I will send
to you this Omni Law Legal Package for free if you put $100.00 or
more in my Omni Law Loan Program shown on my national website.
Whether I will offer this after Oct. 10, 2015 I have not committed to
yet. If I continue it as an offer, you may even have to pay out $500
to get it then one way or another after Oct. 10., 2015. It is all
copyrighted and I allow you to use it for your private use and run
extra copies for your own use and your family, but not to be
reprinted nor shown to others. This is valuable legal property and I
retain legal rights to it. You may for yourself use the information
in the legal package any way you see fit including copying any or all
of the other reports with the format sample of the Common Law Trust
in court filings, legal records for your own Common Law Trust, etc.
You may use it for whatever legal purposes you need for yourself. If
you want, you may use your own attorney to officially write this
Common Law Trust up for you, but as most lawyers are not too familiar
with Common Law Trusts, he may learn some new law by reading what is
in the legal package!

Our website is www.fastboomamericaneconomy.com
Our email is fastboomamericaneconomy.com@gmail.com
You can put in $100.00 or more in our Omni Law Loan Program and as a
note say “For Common Law Info.” Or if you can’t place an
order through our website, our mailing address is NIFI, P.O. Box
1465, Seneca, SC 29679. Make checks, etc. out to NIFI and tell us
what the payment is for. Please allow a little time to send out legal
package for you as we need to know how many copies to prepare for
filling orders. 


Sabotaged? Grassroots effort to overturn SB277 forced vaccine bill claim hundreds of thousands of signatures are missing

Grassroots effort to overturn SB277 forced vaccine bill claim
hundreds of thousands of signatures are missing

Wednesday, 30-Sep-2015 12:54:33

Sabotaged? Grassroots effort to overturn SB277 forced vaccine bill claim hundreds of thousands of signatures are missing

by: Julie Wilson staff writer

Natural News

Sep 29, 2015

(NaturalNews) UPDATE: All the petitions from San
Diego County were in fact turned and accounted for. Text has been added
to clarify that the actual number of signatures can not currently be verified.
A major grassroots effort to overturn
California’s recently passed SB277 forced vaccination bill came to an
end yesterday as volunteers reached the Monday deadline to submit
signatures they have worked tirelessly to collect over a three-month
To immediately halt the mandatory vaccine bill
and qualify it for the November 2016 ballot, volunteers needed to gather
366,000 signatures.
As the September 28 deadline neared,
@SB277Referendum leaders appeared excited and optimistic about reaching
their goal, with the initiative’s leader Libertarian Tim Donnelly
posting photos of boxes stacked high and loaded with signed petitions.
On September 16, referendum leaders estimated
that they had received at least 300,000 signatures, and two weeks later
there was buzz that they had reached close to half a million signatures.
Leaders also announced that they received an
extremely generous donation of $150,000 from an in-state donor, bringing
their total funds raised to over $300,000 – a remarkable undertaking
for a grassroots effort that was given so little time to prepare.
SB277 Referendum volunteers suspect sabotage from within as panic ensues
Despite the positive social media posts leading
up to the deadline, things started to go awry once volunteers began
submitting their signatures, with petitioners citing huge discrepancies
in various counties and some claiming that they only received credit for
a third of what was turned in to referendum managers Donnelly and
Lauren Stephens, who were responsible for submitting the petitions to
validation companies.
While signature numbers are still unknown, what
is clear is that the number of signatures validated thus far is much
lower than previously estimated. Below are some estimates of the
• San Diego County submitted eight boxes of signatures but only received one in return

• Orange County is missing 6,000 signatures

• San Bernardino County is missing 8,000

• Sacramento County is missing 15,000 – 20,000 signatures
While signature totals are still
unknown, only an estimated 100,000 of the potential half a million
signatures have been accounted for – meaning somehow, hundreds of thousands of signatures are missing

Implement N.E.S.A.R.A. Now To Bring In The Republic

Implement N.E.S.A.R.A. Now
To Bring In The Republic

Go to: NESARA What Really Happened….and how NESARA GOT SIGNED INTO LAW!! yet
this was posted on another site years ago, so now it is 15 years ago,
– What has been deliberately hidden from Americans
to get more
details of N.E.S.A.R.A.!

If you don’t take action now for your
Constitutional Government then you will end up like those during
Stalin’s time in Russia and died as you opposed their way of

If you want more details of all the Acts and
Resolutions of Congress that got us here from the way it should be in
1861 then go to look at all the documents posted on: Nesaranews
Constitution And Founding Documents
and see for yourself.

To see the details of N.E.S.A.R.A. on video
then go to: One
World Trust!
and watch Part 3 as that gives a more recent of THE
UNITED STATES, INC. corruption, but if you think this is all lies
then you must support that it is necessary for the government to be a

Maybe something would result if Thousands of
you go to West Virginia and support Thomas Deegan’s case and cause:
those who have eyes to see and ears to hear…
and ‘Sovereign
citizen’ arrested after threats to take over state Capitol

Are Americans And Britons Being Prepped For A Military Coup?

Americans And Britons Being Prepped For A Military Coup?
Date: Wednesday, 30-Sep-2015 12:45:30

A recent
poll conducted by YouGov revealed that a sizable portion of the American
public is open to the idea of a military coup in the United States. The
poll was conducted amid the continual polling that takes place during
the U.S. Presidential election yet it did not focus on the elections per
se, but the potential lack of elections in the future.
The YouGov poll surveyed 1,000 people online and
determined that 29% of Americans, over a quarter of the population,
could imagine supporting a military coup against the civilian
government. Only 41% could not imagine supporting a coup.
The numbers supporting a potential coup were
highest among Republicans with 43% of them saying they could envision
supporting a coup, 29% of independents followed, with Democrats trailing
at 20%.
The numbers apparently increased in support when
the question asked “whether they would hypothetically support the
military stepping in to take control from a civilian government which is
beginning to violate the constitution.”
Critics of the polls have suggested that the
method used to conduct the survey was largely unscientific and not a
reasonable representation of an accurate sampling of the general
American public.
Regardless of how it was conducted, the real
question here is “Why was this poll conducted in the first place?” Why
are Americans being asked if they would support a military coup? After
all, in the past, whenever a critic of the government would suggest such
a possibility, that individual was laughed off the stage as being
paranoid and hyperbolic. We are told military coups are not an option in
the United States and, being the exceptional nation, we are outside of
history. We are told that the very idea that a military coup could ever
take place is laughable. So, why the poll?
Indeed, as the TWSP has asked, “Who commissioned
it? Was it ordered up by a clique of ambitious and disgruntled military
men eager to redeem their defeats on the battlefield with some kind of
seizure of power here in the United States? Up to now, we do not know
these answers.”
The question is thus: Are the American people
being prepped to accept a military coup in the United States and the
subsequent martial law that will almost inevitably follow such a seizure
of power?
Was this poll conducted for the benefit of the
oligarchs who would perpetuate this coup? Not likely, since the Pentagon
and the Military-Government-Intelligence apparatus already has
extravagant ways of knowing whether or not the American people are
receptive to coups. Was it merely an exercise in predictive programming
and trend setting polling data – the same method that is used in color
revolutions – to create a sense of social consensus and promote the idea
that the majority supports a specific idea?
But the United States is not the only country
that has had talk of military coups as of late. Upon the election of
Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the UK Labor Party, a “senior serving
general” opined that, if Corbyn was ever elected as Prime Minister, the
military might simply remove him from power.
According to a report by the London Daily Mail,
“A senior serving general, speaking anonymously
to the Sunday Times, said Mr. Corbyn’s victory has been greeted with
‘wholesale dismay’ in the army.”
He added:
“There would be mass resignations at all levels
and you would face the very real prospect of an event which would
effectively be a mutiny.
‘Feelings are running very high within the armed
forces. You would see a major break in convention with senior generals
directly and publicly challenging Corbyn over vital important policy
decisions such as Trident, pulling out of NATO and any plans to
emasculate and shrink the size of the armed forces…
The Army just wouldn’t stand for it. The general
staff would not allow a prime minister to jeopardize the security of
this country and I think people would use whatever means possible, fair
or foul to prevent that. You can’t put a maverick in charge of a
country’s security.’”
Corbyn’s plans and “reforms” are relatively mild
on many accounts. However, that is apparently enough to justify the
seizure of total power by the military in the minds of some. It also
echoes the past claims by retired Army Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a friend of
accused pedophile and avowed Satanist Michael Aquino, that he had
answered a call asking if he would lead a coup against the civilian
government if he were provided with 250,000 marines. Vallely responded
that, yes, he would indeed lead a coup if the conditions were right.
While it remains to be seen what plans are being set in motion for the future
of civilian governments in the United States and the UK, it is greatly
concerning that convenient polls regarding military coups are being
conducted and disseminated amongst the public while serving and retired
military officials talk openly of the same act of treason. As discontent
grows with higher unemployment, increased immigration, more foreign
wars, higher food prices, and lower living standards, it is apparent
that the ruling elite in both the United States and the UK – actually
one and the same – are preparing to ensure that such discontent will be
crushed and that no reforms, however modest, will ever be allowed to
move forward.

Gates Foundation claims ‘foul’ and files lawsuit over its investment losses in Brazilian oil giant Petrobras

Foundation claims ‘foul’ and files lawsuit over its investment losses
in Brazilian oil giant Petrobras

Wednesday, 30-Sep-2015 12:43:17

these investment losses a form of karmic payback for Gates’ endorsement
and support of Common Core, Monsanto/GMOs, and vaccines?
Gates Foundation sues Petrobras, PwC over scandal


Sep 26, 2015

Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ charity foundation
has filed a legal complaint against Brazilian oil giant Petrobras over
investment losses linked to alleged fraud at the company.
“The depth and breadth of the fraud within
Petrobras is astounding. By Petrobras’s own admission, the kickback
scheme infected over $80 billion of its contracts, representing
one-third of its total assets,” according to the suit filed late
Thursday in New York City.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
together with WGI Emerging Markets Fund, alleged in the suit that the
Brazilian oil firm repeatedly misrepresented its financial statements in
order to trick investors into giving money.
According to the suit, accounting giant PwC
played an important role in misleading investors by attesting to
Petrobras’ financial statements.
“Equally breathtaking is that the fraud went on
for years under PwC’s watch, who repeatedly endorsed the integrity of
Petrobras’ internal controls and financial reports. This is a case of
institutional corruption, criminal conspiracy and a massive fraud on the
investing public,” the suit read.

Hurricane Joaquin intensifies near Bahamas, East Coast possibly in the path

Hurricane Joaquin intensifies near Bahamas, East Coast possibly in the path

Brian McNoldy
and Angela
September 30 at 1:47 PM

Joaquin rapidly intensified overnight and is now a Category 1 tracking
west toward the Bahamas. Though there continues to be a high amount of
uncertainty in the forecast, Hurricane Joaquin could track toward the
East Coast this weekend, which is now in the cone of the National
Hurricane Center forecast.
At 2 p.m. Wednesday, Hurricane Joaquin
had sustained winds of 85 mph and a central pressure of 968 millibars.
Further intensification is expected over the next three days; the
National Hurricane Center is forecasting Joaquin strengthen into a
Category 3 with winds of 115 mph on Saturday as it tracks north toward
the East Coast, eventually weakening before any potential landfall.


[What Hurricane Joaquin might mean for the D.C. region]

Hurricane warnings are in effect for the central Bahamas, with hurricane watches extending to the western Bahamas.

of an exact track, moisture associated with Joaquin will get pulled
into an advancing low pressure and almost certainly deliver dangerous
amounts of rain over the eastern U.S., from the Carolinas to Maine.

has the potential to be a very significant storm for the mid-Atlantic
and northeastern states. Heavy rain will be the first threat to the
region on Thursday and Friday. The latest guidance from the National
Weather Service includes an enormous swath of rainfall totals in excess
of 6 inches over the coming week, with as much as 10 inches falling on
the Virginia, Maryland and Delaware coasts.
By Saturday, coastal
erosion and storm surge flooding could become a huge problem starting in
the Carolinas and working its way up to New England by Sunday.

[Possible impacts from Hurricane Joaquin on the D.C. region]

most recent wave forecast from NOAA shows significant heights higher
than 30 or 40 feet on Sunday — a very ominous scenario.  Even if the
storm center remains offshore, or it begins to transition to a
non-tropical cyclone, strong onshore winds will generate a substantial
storm surge flooding along the coast, particularly during the regular
astronomical high tides.

the past 24 hours, the vertical wind shear that was keeping Joaquin at
bay has gradually decreased, and the storm was quick to respond. The
peak winds increased from 40 mph on Tuesday morning to 80 mph on
Wednesday morning. The very warm ocean water under it is also
undoubtedly fueling the hurricane. Environmental conditions are expected
to remain favorable for Joaquin to intensify until Saturday, with a
window for rapid intensification now through Friday.
Joaquin has
been moving slowly and is forecast to drift to the southwest for another
two days before getting picked up by the trough moving over the East
Coast. At that point Hurricane Joaquin will head north, but there is
great uncertainty in the details of how that will happen.

[Interactive infographic: Billion-dollar weather disasters since 1980]

models suggest Joaquin will turn quickly to the north and then curve
toward the East Coast, while others push the hurricane out into the
Atlantic and away from land.The uncertainty in track forecast right now
cannot be understated, and it is not even represented well by the
official track forecast by the National Hurricane Center. Unfortunately
in this situation, the spread in the forecast models is far greater in
size than the cone of uncertainty in the official forecast.

McNoldy works in cyclone research at the University of Miami’s
world-renowned Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science
(RSMAS). His website hosted at RSMAS is also quite popular during
hurricane season.

Angela Fritz is an atmospheric scientist and The Post’s deputy weather editor.


NWO With Pope Shutting Down US Government Corporation

With Pope Shutting Down US Government Corporation

People are now seeing that Pope Francis is
going to shut down the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and all the
other corporations, however he will be implementing the Vatican as
the Sole Authority for the World, and he is claiming himself as the
ONLY person that can communicate between the people and god.

We The People should follow thru and let the
Pope take most of the actions, however when the time comes then we
just step in before he takes total control.


Pope disarms America (people consent unwittingly) 



Pope acting as U.S. Military Commander in Chief (Court of Ages acts to counter) 

199 Days: Treasury Says Debt Has Been Frozen at $18,112,975,000,000

199 Days: Treasury Says Debt Has Been Frozen at $18,112,975,000,000

Treasury Secretary says Treasury could continue in a “debt issuance suspension period” through at least the end of October

199 Days: Treasury Says Debt Has Been Frozen at $18,112,975,000,000

by Terence P. Jeffrey | CNS News |
September 30, 2015

The portion of the federal debt that is subject to a legal limit set
by Congress closed Monday, Sept. 28, at $18,112,975,000,000, according
to the latest Daily Treasury Statement, which was published at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday.

That, according to the Treasury’s statements, makes 199 straight days the debt subject to the limit has been frozen at $18,112,975,000,000.

$18,112,975,000,000 is about $25 million below the current legal debt limit of $18,113,000,080,959.35.

Read more



Pope Pushes Malthusian Elite Agenda In Historic Call For New Global Order

Pope Pushes Malthusian Elite Agenda In Historic Call For New Global Order

Pope Pushes Malthusian Elite Agenda In Historic Call For New Global Order
by Bernie Suarez | The Sleuth Journal |
September 30, 2015

Government corruption by lobbyist to silence the voices of the
people, staged war on terror, endless illegal wars of aggression,
ongoing false flag operations with crisis actors, out of control police
state, creation and arming proxy terrorist armies like ISIS,
geoengineering ongoing crimes against humanity and the planet, ongoing
GMO poisoning of the human race’s DNA, the list goes on and on of all
the issues ‘Pope Francis’ did NOT address in his “historic” visit to the
U.S. this week. The rote ceremonies, staged political speeches and
propaganda have been ongoing particularly after the Pope’s visit and
speech to Congress where he officially endorsed the coming “sustainable”
new world order.

That’s right. Instead of addressing the problems humanity faces mentioned above, Pope Francis conveniently echoed almost
all the key talking points consistent with the desires of the
controlling Oligarchs who want to rule the world. The most important
message that being to endorse the anthropogenic global warming turned
climate change issue by talking about the “environment”. The environment
issue as it relates to the original global warming CO2 lie, is the most
important issue as without it the global elitists will never be able to
force Agenda 21 and thus “sustainability” on humanity. Without it, they
will never get their global carbon taxes to fund the global government
for which the Pope seems to be speaking on behalf of. And thus they will
never get their new world order. This IS the most important issue, and I
would argue is possibly the primary reason for this whole Pope staged
visit to the U.S. with corresponding national, global 24/7 mainstream
media coverage. Summarizing some of the topics covered by the Pope MSN
writers stated:

“Taking a rostrum never before occupied by the bishop
of Rome, the pontiff issued a vigorous call to action on issues largely
favored by liberals, including a powerful defense of immigration, a
critique of the excesses of capitalism, an endorsement of environmental
legislation, a blistering condemnation of the arms trade and a plea to
abolish the death penalty.”

As you can see the other (secondary) agendas on the Pope’s list
include issues to promote the ideas of globalization and the Malthusian
Eugenics ideology of scarcity. Most people familiar with the global
elitists long term plan for global domination know that the plan links
back to the Club of Rome and
the Committee of 300 among other entities. And listening to Pope
Francis one cannot help but to notice that almost every issue he raised
just happened to coincide perfectly with the agenda of the Club of Rome
and the Committee of 300.

Walking a fine line trying not to make it too obvious that his main
goal is political, Pope Francis lightly touches some issues related to
religion, spirituality and individuality, but more heavily emphasizes
other collectivist issues aside from the environment such as
immigration, and poverty. As MSN themselves puts it:

“While he checked boxes in calling for religious
liberty and defending the family, the heart of his address, and the most
time, was dedicated to aspects of Catholic teaching embraced by
progressives, especially the overriding need to help the poor and
destitute. He was at his most passionate in embracing immigration,
alluding to his own family’s history of moving from Italy to Argentina,
where he was born.”

Even segments of liberal mainstream media were not impressed by the
Pope’s attempt to sound “progressive”. Huffington Post’s Howard Fineman
charged the Pope with wanting to be “president of the world“:

“As devout as he is, and as focused on the faith
and practice of the Catholic Church, Francis is also campaigning to lead
public, secular, political discourse worldwide. He is arguing that the
two realms of faith and politics are one, and that the moral and
spiritual teachings of faith should inform and guide political decisions
for “our common home.”

What we have seen the last few days during this Pope visit media
frenzy is a horrific attempt by the globalist to reinforce the
collectivist “greater good” ideas in all our consciousness in
preparation for what they hope will be a “sustainable” prison planet
where they (the global Oligarchs) will rule the world by controlling
every aspect of it. All of this will be perceived to be for the sake of
the collective and of course the planet whose health is apparently in
the hands of the controlling politically-divinely appointed rulers.

They need this new world order now and they’ve chosen the Pope as
the messenger of their plans. He was chosen probably because they hope
the Pope will appeal to Catholics (and perhaps non-Catholics) around the
world. There’s no question in my mind he’s being used as a mouthpiece
for the roll-out of the new world order in every sense of the way.

And just in case you are not convinced this is about pushing the
new world order based on Malthusian Eugenics principles? Then it may
interest you that the mainstream media made sure to put out several
other stories just to keep the Agenda 21-style new world order theme
brewing strongly in our heads. In another story mainstream media is
talking about how “Investors are mining for water” and how this is the “next hot commodity“. We again see how the Malthusian principle of scarcity is being pushed in perfect timing with the Pope’s visit.

“Investing in the water industry is one of the
great opportunities for the coming decades,” said Matthew J. Diserio of
Water Asset Management, a New York firm that is a major backer of Cadiz.
“Water is the scarce resource that will define the 21st century, much
like plentiful oil defined the last century.”  

We should not be surprised seeing that all of these issues have been
clearly defined and stated as the go-to issues for creating the coming
global order.

In another story recently posted to coincide with the Pope’s visit we’re told that China is scheduled to “launch national cap-and-trade
plan by 2017 again reminding people of the need for reducing carbon
output. Again, all part of the original Al Gore false “anthropogenic
global warming” claims.

Also in yet another not-so-coincidental move another story was
posted that reminds readers that this coming Sunday September 27 2015
Paris will go “car-free” as a gesture to help with the environment.

Again, we all knew this was coming. Many of us have been covering
the planning of these new world order/Agenda 21 ceremonial-like events
and the events are now here. These are truly historic times we live in
and unlike previous global government events of the past, today we have
the internet and worldwide alternative-new media to expose all of these
lies and deceit.

We know what the globalist are up to. It doesn’t matter who they
choose as their mouthpiece, we will see through their lies and
deception. Let’s not be fooled by these recent Pope ceremonies which is
just the latest propaganda the global elite have rolled out on humanity
to sell their long term plans for permanent global enslavement.


Stay informed. If you are still not sure why over 30,000 scientists
and researchers sued Al Gore for fraud then ask and do your own
research. Also do your research and find out about groups like the Club
of Rome and the Committee of 300 and confirm their documented goals of
controlling all of humanity by introducing an environmental-relate
crisis which humans would have to be responsible for cooperating in.

Read about the concept and the history of Malthusianism and
try to see if the message sounds familiar with today’s “sustainable”
message. Try to connect the dots and see the truth for yourself. That’s
the knowledge part of the solution. Then share this knowledge and takes
steps in your personal life to focus on strengthening and expanding your
own sovereignty and your freedoms. Focus on your own family network and
friend and realize the value of it. Focus on taking action at the local
level to protect your town and city from the top-down control of
government. We must find ways to promote government from the bottom-up.
Every must realize as soon as possible that every form of top-down
governance leads to tyranny. There is no other way. For this reason
bottom-up governance is the only form of government that can be
considered if we’re going to have a government.

For some people removing your consent all together may be the
best option. We’re all in this mess by consent after all and each and
every one of us has an option of acquiring the knowledge we need to
start taking steps toward detaching ourselves from our legal fictional
characters created for us since birth. If enough people truly wrap their
heads around this reality we may be able to nullify the new world order
on the spot. Are we ready for this? That is the bigger question.
Hopefully we are because its here now. 


US judge dismisses September 11 victims’ case against Saudi Arabia

US judge dismisses September 11 victims’ case against Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia had sovereign immunity from damage claims

US judge dismisses September 11 victims' case against Saudi Arabia

by The Guardian |
September 30, 2015

A US judge on Tuesday dismissed claims against Saudi Arabia by
families of victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks, who accused the
country of providing material support to al Qaeda.

US district judge George Daniels in Manhattan said Saudi Arabia had
sovereign immunity from damage claims by families of nearly 3,000 people
killed in the attacks, and from insurers that covered losses suffered
by building owners and businesses.
“The allegations in the complaint alone do not provide this court
with a basis to assert jurisdiction over defendants,” Daniels wrote.
The victims had sought to supplement their case with new allegations
to avoid that result, including based on testimony they secured from
Zacarias Moussaoui, a former al Qaeda operative imprisoned for his role
in the attacks.
Daniels said even if he allowed the plaintiffs to assert those new
claims, doing so would be “futile, however, because the additional
allegations do not strip defendants of sovereign immunity.”
Read more