The REAL George H.W. Bush

The REAL George H.W. Bush

Curious George, the famous television monkey, was created by Alan J. Shalleck and Margaret Rey.
Shalleck was murdered in 2006 just 3 days before the Curious George movie was released.
He had been planning to expose the true identity of George H. W. Bush as the “Curious George” son of inventor Nikola Tesla’s Nazi accountant, George H. Scherff Sr.


In 1998, 29 year old Eric Bermen of Florida began dating a local girl whose 6′- 4″ ninety year old father turned out to be Otto Skorzeny, the legendary SS (Schutzstaffel) commando of World War II fame, personal bodyguard to Adolf Hitler, and subsequent life-long CIA operative.
(youtube has banned/censored almost all videos about the true identity of George H W Bush)
In the months prior to Skorzeny’s death in December, 1999, Skorzeny revealed to Berman the whereabouts and activities of major personalities of the Third Reich who were either declared dead by historians or otherwise reported to have been living in undisclosed locations abroad.
Skorzeny’s lifelong circle of  intimate associates – many living in the United States – included Martin BormannJosef MengeleAlois BrunnerWalter Rauff, and Reinhard Gehlen. An even more surprising revelation from Skorzeny, involved two domestic Nazis operatives, both well known to the American public: Prescott Sheldon Bush and his “son”, George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st President of the United States.


To buttress his story, Skorzeny produced a shoebox filled with over one hundred photographs spanning a period of more than sixty years and gave them to Berman. The photos were of the usual family poses taken at weddings, anniversaires, holidays, or family reunions in the decades between the 1930′s and the 1990′s, but what made these photos highly extraordinary was the identity of the individuals seen within those photographs.
The shoebox photos show Otto Skorzeny posing with the above named Third Reich personalites, along with additional photographs showing Skorzeny posing with Prescott Bush, his wife, Dorothy Walker Bush, and their son, George Herbert Walker Bush. To say that Berman was in the “right place, at the right time” and was handed what may turn out to be the biggest story to ever come down the pike, is the understatement of the century.
Following Skorzeny’s death on December 31, 1999, Bermen gathered additional information about Skorzeny’s Nazi cohorts and put the entire story together with 60 or 70 of Skorzeny’s shoe box photos – into a copyrighted unpublished manuscript called The Bush Connection.
Some of the more explosive highlights of Skorzeny’s revelations include:


The true identity and Nazi-planned subversive mission of George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States; alleged to have been brought into America (with Skorzeny as his body guard) and covertly adopted by Trading-with-The-Enemy convicted Prescott Bush. Skorzeny claimed that GHW Bush’s real birth name was George H. Scherff, Jr., son of George Scherff, Sr., German born assistant to inventor Nikola Tesla.
Curious young George allegedly spent his first years in America snooping around Tesla’s lab, helping his father (George Scherff Sr.) in the 1930′s steal or glean whatever they could of Tesla’s work and report back to Germany. Tesla had casually remarked to an artisan couple named Rey who had recently emigrated to the United States, of the mischievous and devious prying nature of a “little monkey” around his lab whom he had dubbed “curious George.” This character would later become the basis of the children’s book series, “Curious George”


Skorzeny’s role (with Reinhard Gehlen) in the assassination of Nikola Tesla (suffocation) on January 6, 1943 after tricking Tesla on January 5 into revealing the full details of his most important discoveries and then stealing his most valuable inventions, along with the contents of his safe, which were delivered to Hitler,


The faked April 1945 “suicide” of Hitler in the Berlin bunker (corroborating the 1948 CIA interrogation of Gestapo Chief Heinrich Mueller, the Nordon Report, and the Russian 1946 Investigative Committee report to Stalin)


Skorzeny’s pivotal role in consolidating the intelligence assets of the Nazi Gestapo and the Nazi-infiltrated OSS (Office of Strategic Services) into the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1947, working with George Herbert Walker Bush (Nazi infiltrator George H. Scherff, Jr.), Nazi SS spy master Reinhard Gehlen, “Wild Bill” Donovan (compromised), and fifth columnist, Allen Foster Dulles. Skorzeny claimed central responsibility for setting up the Odessa operation to surreptitiously relocate 50,000 (FIFTY THOUSAND) Nazis into North and South America with CIA complicity and protection,


Skorzeny’s claim that Reinhard Gehlen, Josef Mengele, and George H W Bush directly participated in JFK’s assassination and other Nazi-inspired plots.
Don Nicoloff published a well researched treatise in two parts in April 2007 in the Idaho Observer titled “Deathbed Confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr., was the 41st U.S. president”.
The historical archives indicate that “Otto Skorzeny” died in Madrid, Spain in 1975, but Skorzeny told Berman that the date was faked by the CIA, as were the “deaths” of many Third Reich notables. The Third Reich intelligence apparatus, under General Reinhard Mueller, towards the end of the war, faked many “deaths” in anticipation of losing World War II.

Understanding the U.S. Constitution – The Preamble

Understanding the U.S.
Constitution – The Preamble
Uploaded on Jun
19, 2010

“We The People” is a Capitonym: A capitonym is a word that changes
its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized… Definition
– Homonyms that have the same spelling, but which have different meanings and,
perhaps, different pronunciations when capitalized. [The Online Dictionary of
Language Terminology]
Example – (1) The proper noun Polish (as in ‘someone from Poland’) is
pronounced ‘poh – lish, whereas (2) the verb polish (as in ‘making something
shiny’) is pronounced ‘pah – lish.

The People” does not include you and me.
“The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United
States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government
of the individual States
. Each State established a constitution for itself,
and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the
powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the
United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed
best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their
interests.” [Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243]

“But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on
the ground of a breech of the Constitution
. The Constitution, it is true,
is a compact (contract), but he is not a party to it. The States are a party to
it…” (emphasis added). [Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and
Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854) just do a google search for
Padelford Case 1854 on scribed.]

I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions,
upon laws and courts. These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes.
“Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no
Constitution, no law, no court can save it.” Spirit of Liberty 189 Judge
learned Hand.

Magnetic Campaign Signs for Constitutional Candidates

Subject: Magnetic
Campaign Signs for Constitutional Candidates
Magnetic Signs for cars and trucks
an excellent way to promote the candidacy of Constitutional County Sheriffs
Keith Broaders at (951) 282-3271


control which emails you receive on WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !, click

Firearms Refresher Course

Subj: Firearms Refresher
Firearms Refresher
1. “Those who
hammer their guns into plows, will plow for those who do not.”~Thomas

2. “Those who trade liberty for security, have neither.” ~
John Adams

3. Free men DO NOT ask permission to bear arms.

4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens, tries to control

6. Gun control is not about guns; it’s about control.

7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8. Know guns, know peace, know safety.
No guns, no peace, no safety.

9. You don’t shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the
ignore the others.
Just in case you
haven’t noticed, they already
ignore the others.

14. What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ do you
NOT understand?

15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.

16. When you remove the people’s right to bear arms, you create slaves.

17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

“I love this
country; it’s the government I’m wary of”!!!

Secret Human Testing Revealed in Declassified U.S. Army Documents; Lawsuit Follows

Pakalert Press
Human Testing Revealed in Declassified U.S. Army Documents; Lawsuit Follows
West  AP
It is always a
challenge attempting to describe how sick and power mad are some of the elite
who have taken up positions within the military-industrial-scientific complex.
However, it is becoming easier, as more of their past demented actions are
coming to light with such a preponderance of evidence that even the most naive
must take notice. These actions only hint at what is likely going on all around
us today, as well as the future plans of those who see the planet Earth as
nothing more than a giant Petri dish.
Secret Human Testing Revealed in Declassified U.S
Despite statements at the time which
downplayed the spraying as non-toxic, the evidence shows that the Army knew
that what was sprayed consisted of radioactive compounds breathed in by
hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens. Furthermore, they went to great lengths
to cover up the information.
Martino-Taylor says she’s obtained documents from multiple
federal agencies showing the government concocted an elaborate story to keep
the testing secret.
says some of the key players in the cover-up were also members of the ManhattanAtomic Bomb Project and involved in other
radiological testing across the United States at the time. ‘This was against
all military guidelines of the day, against all ethical guidelines, against allinternational codes such as
the Nuremberg Code.’  (Source)
Martino-Taylor is
pressing for an investigation into whether or not the spraying could have led
to illnesses, including cancer.
The abstract of her
dissertation reads as follows:
piece analyzes a covert Manhattan Project spin-off organization
referred to here as theManhattan-Rochester Coalition, and an obscure aerosol study in St. Louis, Missouri, conducted
under contract by the U.S. military from
1953–1954, and 1963–1965. The military-sponsored studies targeted a segregated,
high-density urban area, where low-income persons of color predominantly
resided. Examination of the Manhattan-Rochester Coalition and the St.
Louisaerosol studies, reveal their connections to each other, and to a
much larger military project that secretly tested humans, both alive and
deceased, in an effort to understand the effects of weaponized radiation.
Through this case study, the author explores how a large number of participants
inside an organization will willingly participate in organizational acts
that are harmful to others, and how large numbers of outsiders, who may or may
not be victims of organizationalactivities, are unable to determine
illegal or harmful activity by an organization. The author explains how ethical
and observational lapses are engineered by the organization through several
specific mechanisms, in an effort to disable critical analysis, and prevent
both internal and external dissent of harmful organizational actions.
Through studying the process of complexorganizational deviance, we
can develop public policies that protect the public’s right to know, and construct checks
and methods to minimize the chance of covert projects that are contrary to
societal norms.
You can click here  (   to access the full
This story is
important to keep in mind, as mad scientists are at work transforming
the climate
 through anaerosol spraying campaign.
They, too, insist that what is being sprayed is not harmful even as cases of respiratory illness, cancer, Alzheimer’s and
mystery diseases across nature continue to climb
(here andhere).
New diseases such as Morgellons have
emerged, which seem to indicate a nano-level component
that very well could be targeting human DNA.
Dr. Lisa
Martino-Taylor’s research has received mainstream media attention
due to the overwhelming amount of undeniable evidence.
According to KDSK News,
St. Louis, many people subsequently came forward to say they remembered the
. . . 
“Men in protective suits, on roofs, with machines spewing a
thick fog. One of them is Benjamin Phillips. He
believes his numerous health issues may be connected to the secret tests.
 . . . men in protective
suits, on roofs, with machines spewing a thick fog. One of them is
Phillips. He
believes his numerous health issues may be connected to the secret tests.
Coverage of the lawsuit can be seen below, which
implicates Parsons
SRI International and,
, Monsanto:
video removed from the net
Refer to:
These tests serve as the perfect example to discuss
with anyone who hurls the word conspiracy in your direction to
shut down discussion of uncomfortable topics.

This type of testing
is not an aberration. Click here for some other gruesome
government experiments
 from our supposed benevolent protectors
that treated humans like lab rats.  (

Open Letter For Public Release this date

Subject: Open Letter
For Public Release this date
An open letter concerning the “Gun Control” threats made by
public figures and Legislators.
If some drunk runs over a bunch of preschoolers at a bus stop,
that does not give you, society or the government the right/authority to
take MY car or restrict what kind of car I can own.
If some meth head goes on a rampage at the local day care with
a chainsaw,that does not give you, society or the government the
right/authority to take MY chainsaw or restrict what kind of chainsaw I can
If some insane boy-man guns down a bunch of school kids with
any kind of firearm,that does not give you, society or the government the
right/authority to take MY firearm or restrict what kind of firearm I can
The US has over 300 Federal and major State Firearms laws on
the books.(a very conservative figure) Every one of which is
unconstitutional. No law will save you from the insane or criminally
inclined. The only thing that will suffice to defend your family is the
ownership of a weapon and the will to use it.
The 2nd Amendment was never about hunting, or even self
defense. It is all about the Citizen’s ability to defend themselves against
tyranny by the government or the majority. What part of “…Shall not
be infringed” do the Marxists not understand?
In reality I think they understand perfectly, that as long as
‘we the people’ are armed they cannot run roughshod over the Constitution.
That is why they have moved slowly and discreetly to usurp our rights on a
daily basis for decades. They fear us, they fear discovery and openness.
They fear the removal of their masks as liberals or “progressives”. We know
their true face, history has shown us

many times. The Collectivist Central Governments of Russia, China,
Cambodia and North Korea killed more than 200 MILLION people during the
last decades of the 20th Century.
We will NOT allow them to repeat their Socialist nightmare
here. We will resist, we will not comply.

We will not permit the confiscation of our property. We will not
allow cries of “Save us!”, “Protect us!”

or “It’s for the Children!” to be used as justifications for the
majority to deny us our natural rights.
Let me state clearly and publicly for the record and for
posterity’s sake. We will not comply with any further infringements. We
will resist. If attacked, we will fight. If accosted at our homes we will
shoot back. God have mercy on those in Government, Media or “Law
Enforcement” who threaten our families, because we will show none.
We make this statement not in anger or fear, but with sound
minds and firm resolve.

Let our servants in the public sector and the intellectual, media,
and academic elitists who

support them take note and understand the very personal results of
their actions. If our families suffer,

so shall yours. We know where you live, we know where you work, we
know where you dine and shop. Your bodyguards and contractors cannot
protect you from determined men with nothing left to lose. Stay away from
our families, homes and property, you have been warned.
From One unit of the United States Militia
Molon Labe


control which emails you receive on WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !, click

High School 1957 vs High School 2010

Subject: Fw: High School 1957 vs High
School 2010

SCHOOL — 1957 vs. 2010
 Scenario 1: 
Jack goes
quail hunting before school and then pulls into the school parking lot
with his shotgun in his truck’s gun rack.
1957 – 
Vice Principal comes over, looks at Jack’s
shotgun, goes to his car and gets his shotgun to show Jack. 
2010 – 
 School goes into lock down, FBI called,
Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again.
Counselors called in for traumatized students and teachers.   

Scenario 2: 
Johnny and
Mark get into a fist fight after school.
1957 – 
Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake
hands and end up
2010 – 
Police called and SWAT team arrives — they
arrest both Johnny and Mark. They are both charged with assault and
both expelled even though Johnny started it.

Scenario 3: 
Jeffrey will
not be still in class, he disrupts other students.
1957 – 
Jeffrey sent to the Principal’s office and given
a good paddling by the Principal. He then returns to class, sits still
and does not disrupt class again. 
2010 – 
Jeffrey is given huge doses of Ritalin. He
becomes a zombie. He is then tested for ADD. The family gets extra
money (SSI) from the government because Jeffrey has a

Scenario 4: 
Billy breaks a
window in his neighbor’s car and his Dad gives him a whipping with his
1957 – 
Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal,
goes to college and becomes a successful businessman. 
2010 – 
 Billy’s dad is arrested for child abuse.
Billy is removed to foster care and joins a gang. The state
psychologist is told by Billy’s sister that she remembers being abused
herself and their dad goes to prison. Billy’s mom has an affair with
the psychologist.  

Scenario 5:
Mark gets a
headache and takes some aspirin to school..
  – Mark shares his aspirin with the
Principal out on the smoking dock 
 –  The police are called and Mark is
expelled from school for drug violations. His car is then searched for
drugs and weapons.   

Scenario 6:
fails high school English.
  – Pedro goes to summer school,
passes English and goes to college. 
 –  Pedro’s cause is taken up by state.
Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that teaching English
as a requirement for graduation is racist. ACLU files class action
lawsuit against the state school system and Pedro’s English teacher.
 English is then banned from core curriculum. Pedro is given his
diploma anyway but ends up mowing lawns for a living because he cannot
speak English.  

Scenario 7: 
Johnny takes
apart leftover firecrackers from the Fourth of July, puts them in a model
airplane paint bottle and blows up a red ant bed.
1957 –
 Ants die. 
2010 –
 ATF, Homeland Security and the FBI are all
called. Johnny is charged with domestic terrorism. The FBI investigates
his parents — and all siblings are removed from their home and all
computers are confiscated Johnny’s dad is placed on a terror watch list
and is never allowed to fly again.
Scenario 8:
Johnny falls
while running during recess and scrapes his knee He is found crying by
his teacher, Mary. Mary hugs him to comfort him.
1957 –
  In a short time, Johnny feels better
and goes on playing. 
2010 –
 Mary is accused of being a sexual predator
and loses her job. She faces 3 years in State Prison.  Johnny
undergoes 5 years of therapy.  

should hit every email inbox to show how stupid we
have become!

How many have died because of the FDA?


How many have died because
of the FDA?

Exclusive: Dr. Lee Hieb
argues government regulator does not make you safer

49 mins ago
Dr. Lee Hieb is an orthopaedic surgeon
specializing in spinal surgery. She is past president of the Association of
American Physicians and Surgeons, a free market medical organization.Less ↑
the time of Hippocrates, willow bark extract was known to diminish pain and
inflammation. Lewis and Clark drank willow bark tea, not knowing the chemistry
behind the effects. By the mid 1800′s, however, industrial chemistry was off
and running, and the active ingredient, salicylate, was discovered. In 1897, a
scientist at the German firm Bayer wanted to help his father’s arthritis and
set about creating a compound of salicylate that was less irritating to the
stomach lining. He developed modern “aspirin,” or acetyl-salicylic acid, and
within two years the drug was selling around the world. It not only changed the
lives of arthritis victims, but it inspired chemical companies to search for
other new medicines thereby launching the pharmaceutical industry.

Everyone has heard the quip that if aspirin were invented today it would never
make it through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. And that may
well be true. Aspirin has caused numerous deaths over the years – mostly from
gastric bleeding, but some from overdose and allergy. In the flu pandemic of
1918, some of the deaths are postulated to have resulted from aspirin overdose,
not the viral disease, per se. And although it is probably the cheapest
anti-inflammatory out there, it cannot be said to be unique. Since 1957, the FDA
rules not only on safety, but on efficacy and now on redundancy. In other
words, if you produce a drug that offers no improvement
over current drugs – even though safe and efficacious – you are likely to be
prohibited from marketing it.

it took less than two years to get aspirin from bench studies to worldwide
distribution. Today, on average it takes 15 years of a drug company’s time and
research and development resources to pass through the sphincter of the FDA.
What is the result of this long drawn out process? Are we – as they claim –
safer? I think just the opposite.

In medicine we speak of errors of “commission” – problems from administering a
treatment, and errors of “omission” – errors that arise from failing to give treatment.
The FDA supposedly prevents harmful drugs from getting to market (an error of
commission) and points to its withholding approval for thalidomide – a
mutagenic drug approved with damaging effect in Europe – as its model for

But in truth, the dangers of thalidomide were determined by doctors in the
field, not government office workers, and the FDA stalled for reasons totally
unrelated to the eventual findings. They took credit – rather like taking the
score when a pool ball unexpectedly falls into the correct pocket. Never look
surprised. Look like you meant it.

But the FDA makes us all – in the words of Sam Kazman of the Competitive
Enterprise Institute – “silent victims” due to “errors of omission.” We are
being deprived of life-saving drugs because it is intrinsic to the FDA to stall
Some of the wasted approval time is just more government bureaucratic nonsense.

Even the current FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg conceded before Congress,
“The FDA is relying on 20th century regulatory science to evaluate 21st century
medical products.”

But the real truth is more one of human nature. As Mr. Kazman points out, the
most devastating problem to an FDA regulator is not some silent death in Kansas
due to lack of a new cardiac drug, but rather injured patients lined up before
a congressional committee testifying about a drug that was passed.

As a variant on the principle that if you do nothing you can never be wrong,
FDA regulators’ self-interest is best served by passing the fewest drugs
possible. During one 10-year period, not one new cardiac drug was approved –
and this from the world’s leading pharmaceutical industries.

So, the next time you hear an FDA honcho at a press conference bragging how
they will be saving 35,000 lives each year with the new cardiac drug they just
passed, remember the 35,000 people who died each year waiting 15 years for that
FDA approval.
And it is important to realize that the FDA are not crack researchers –
although they do incestuously employ former drug company people – nor are they
actively practicing physicians. They are paper pushers.

When the anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx came out, as an orthopaedic surgeon
seeing a high volume of patients, I tried using it. It had undergone “extensive
testing” and “FDA approval.” Within three
, I advised my patients to get off the drug, told my office
manager not to refill any prescriptions, and had her call all of our patients
we gave the drug to and suggest they switch to another brand. Within three weeks of observing
patients, I had seen too many side effects, the same side effects that caused
the FDA to withdraw the drug from market three
years later

Now I am not the brightest bulb in the box, but when it comes to evaluating
treatments, I will stack the cumulative experience, clinical skills and
knowledge of a nation of physicians over a few government wonks any day.

And then there is cost. It has been estimated that 25 percent of the cost of
any drug is due to the FDA. I suspect it is higher. If aspirin is any
indication, what the FDA drags out into 15 years could be done in two or three.

Between 1994 and 2004, according to a study from the FDA itself, the
utilization of NME’s – new molecular entities (i.e. new drugs) – went down by
nearly half while the cost of research nearly doubled. And this in an age of
computerization, sequencing of the human genome and efficient chemical
engineering. The lost opportunity and costs are staggering.

There is another result of the long FDA approval: dishonesty. Again consider
human nature. When raising children to be honest, does it help to punish them
severely for being honest about mistakes? Or does it cause them to hide their
mistakes? When the cost of honesty is too high, there is a tendency to

In a free market, such as the environment for the creation of aspirin, when a
line of research proves unsafe, it is easy to drop it and move on – because the
research and development costs are relatively low company expenditures. But
when the major company budget is sunk into a product now 13 or 14 years into
the FDA approval pipeline, what will the company do if problems are noticed?

Obviously if serious life-threatening issues arise, they cannot avoid
withdrawing the drug. But how about lesser problems that may be “under the
radar”? It would only be natural for companies heavily invested in a drug to
minimize problems towards the end of development so as not to lose their
considerable investment.

So what is the answer? Remember when the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval
meant something? Or name brands? Manufacturers were free to produce products,
and you as the consumer were free to choose name brands you trust over white
labels, Seal of Approval items over those not-so-blessed.

If we can’t disband the FDA – which would be my first choice to save untold
taxpayer dollars – let’s at least make it an advisory board. You can choose to
take unapproved (and thus cheaper) drugs, or you can pay more for the
FDA-approved variety.
Keep in mind, in our litigious environment it is certainly not in the best
interest of any drug company to produce a bad drug.
And in my hypothetical system, cancer victims are free to seek “unapproved”
treatments, not having the luxury to await 30-year clinical trials. Drug prices
would come down, not only for the big companies, but because now little
companies could compete, and competition always reduces price. Most
importantly, the marvels of today’s science, instead of being throttled by
overregulation, will be unleashed to create a marvelous new world of medicine.